AI cost for 14,178 pages. No per-page fees, no surprise invoices.
Medical record analysis for litigation teams
Turn medical records into cited work product in minutes.
Chronologies, billing summaries, and deposition prep — with page-level citations on everything. Start with one free matter, inspect the output, and verify any fact in one click before it leaves review.
Page-level citations
Secure access controls
AI does not train on your data
Best fit: record-heavy matters where your team needs a usable first pass and a direct path back to the source page.
Proof buyers can inspect
Benchmark, customer outcome, and platform trust in one place.
See the proof in three ways: real record volume, a real customer result, and clear security basics for sensitive legal files.
Page-level citations are the product requirement, not a nice-to-have.
Use a real matter, inspect the output, and decide from evidence instead of a polished demo.
77 PDFs, 14,178 pages, processed in 15 minutes.
The benchmark matters because it reflects a record-heavy matter, not a clean demo file. The first pass moves quickly, then the reviewer checks citations instead of rebuilding the chronology manually.
Volume
14,178 pages
Files
77 PDFs
First pass
15 minutes
Zhane' JohnsonWe have been using Paralegal Genius at our law firm, and it has completely elevated the way we handle complex medical records. What used to take hours of manually reviewing, organizing, and summarizing records is now done in a fraction of the time with impressive accuracy and consistency.
Paralegal Genius organizes the records into a clear, easy-to-follow timeline and helps us identify gaps and inconsistencies that have been critical in our cases. During depositions or expert questioning, our attorneys have been able to quickly pinpoint specific events in the timeline and reference them in real time.
“If I cannot check the source in seconds, I still have the same review problem.”
This is the standard the workflow is built around: visible citations, fast review, and less time spent hunting through PDFs when a key detail matters.
Cloud
Secure cloud infrastructure
Access
Secure access controls
AI data handling
AI does not train on your data
What the output looks like
The work product, not just a promise.
This is what your team actually reviews. A clean first pass with a direct path back to the source page.
Redacted sample output
Medical chronology
Page-linked
Jan 12
Orthopedic consult
PG-144
Shoulder pain after fall. MRI recommended and follow-up ordered.
Jan 19
Physical therapy start
PG-167
ROM limits noted. Treatment plan added to the chronology and linked to the source page.
Feb 02
Billing event
PG-211
Charge and adjustment captured for downstream damages and billing review.
This is work your team can review and verify without a scavenger hunt. Need a quick answer instead of a full report? Ask PG searches the full case file and cites the source page.
Start with one real case. Review the citations, chronology, and answers before you commit to anything.
Try First Case FreeWhat the platform produces
Four outputs. Every one cited to the source.
See what you get before you start your first case.
Medical chronology
Generate a sortable treatment timeline with dates, providers, diagnoses, and source citations.
Billing summary
Capture charges, adjustments, insurance, out-of-pocket amounts, and balances without hand entry.
Medical codes
Extract ICD-10, CPT, and HCPCS codes directly from the records. Billing and damages analysis starts from verified data, not manual transcription.
Ask PG
Ask questions across the full case file and inspect the source pages before using the answer.
How it works
Upload, analyze, review, export.
The legal team stays in control at every step.
Upload the case file
Add medical records, billing records, and deposition PDFs to a case workspace.
Run the AI pipeline
Paralegal Genius extracts events, billing, codes, and structured answers across the records.
Verify with citations
Every fact links to the source page. Check anything in one click.
Export usable work product
Take the chronology, billing summary, codes, and cited answers into the rest of the litigation workflow.
Why teams change the workflow
Most alternatives fail in one of three ways.
- Manual review: careful but slow, inconsistent across staff, and too expensive to scale.
- Generic AI: fluent summaries, weak structure, unreliable citation behavior.
- Outsourced review: reduces workload but adds turnaround time, vendor dependency, and less control.
Best for Paralegal Genius
Medical-record-heavy litigation workflows where speed only matters if the team can verify the result.
Best for generic AI
Low-stakes drafting and brainstorming where the output does not need structured extraction or page-level proof.
Still have questions? The next sections cover security, supported documents, rollout, and what happens after the free case.
Decision table
Criterion
PG
Generic AI
Manual
Verification
Page-level citations
Inconsistent
Manual only
Speed
Minutes
Fast draft, slow cleanup
4-6h+
Consistency
Structured outputs
Prompt-dependent
Staff-dependent
Security posture
Built for legal review
Varies
Internal only
Trust and security
Built for sensitive records, controlled access, and work your team can check.
Built on secure cloud infrastructure with AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, organization-level data isolation, and secure access controls. AI does not train on your data.
Encrypted at rest (AES-256)
Encrypted in transit (TLS 1.3)
Your firm's data fully isolated
Secure access controls
Unlimited users
Audit-oriented workflow
Questions buyers ask before they start
Common questions before you start.
These are the practical questions teams usually ask once they see the cited output.
What files can we use for the free case?
Medical records, billing records, and deposition PDFs are all included in the free case.
What does the team actually review after processing?
The reviewer sees chronology, billing, code, and cited answers with a direct path back to the source page, so checking the work is part of the workflow instead of a separate cleanup step.
Do we need a rollout or migration before testing fit?
No. Start with one real matter, inspect the cited output, and decide if it is a fit before changing anything broader.
How does security review usually work?
Most buyers start with the homepage summary, then move into the full security page for infrastructure, access control, and data-handling details.
What happens if our team needs a walkthrough first?
Use the form at the bottom of the page if your team needs stakeholder review, a security conversation, or team sign-off before starting a free case.
Will this work for different litigation teams?
Yes. Plaintiff firms, defense teams, and hospital legal departments use the same engine for different record-review needs, which is why those workflows appear later on the page.
Built for different litigation teams
One platform for plaintiff, defense, and hospital legal teams.
One engine. Three bottlenecks. Same cited output.
Personal injury firms
Move from raw records to chronology, billing, and damages support faster.
- Faster demand-package prep
- Cleaner medical damages support
- Better use of paralegal time
Defense litigation firms
Standardize outputs across staff and prepare for expert depositions with less friction.
- Deposition search across testimony
- Contradiction detection with page references
- Consistent work product across teams
Hospital legal departments
Handle medically complex matters with stronger controls, enterprise access, and repeatable outputs.
- Unlimited users
- Organization-level control
- Audit-oriented workflow
8 hours of review at roughly $75 per hour before attorney re-checking.
About one hour of review plus case processing. Roughly $425 saved per case.
Two cases is enough to break even — no rollout, no migration, no long-term contract.
Start with one real matter
Try your first case free before you change your workflow.
Upload one matter. Review the chronology, billing summary, and cited answers. Decide from the output, not from a polished demo.
No rollout and no migration required to test fit. If your team needs a walkthrough before starting, use the form and we will follow up within one business day.
Secondary path
Need a team walkthrough first?
Use this if you need a security review, stakeholder walkthrough, or team sign-off before starting a free case.